Matthew Lang

Social networks are everywhere. Some are aimed at specific individuals and markets while others just want to be the biggest network on the planet. Visit any website for an individual and you're more than likely to see a string of icons where that person can be found on different social networks. You can see one at the top of this page right now. Take a peek. I'll wait.

Did you see it? A conservative list compared to many other network lists on the web. The reason my list is small is that these are the main networks I use on a daily basis. App.net for conversation, Github for coding, LinkedIn for my career and lastly the most over-looked social network of them all, the RSS feed to my blog. Where's the rest you might ask? Well they're not there for good reason. I simply don't use anything else. At all.

I'm happy with the networks I use and take part in and anything more than this would invade my spare time. I just don't have time for anything else. I know plenty of people that use these networks in the right way and it works for them. They might be multi-disciplined professionals and use Github, Dribble and Flickr for their work. They have multiple talents and need more than one network to share their work. A good reason then to on multiple social networks.

For others though I suspect there's more to having a massive list of social networks against their name. For others I think joining multiple networks is nothing more than a ego boost. I could be wrong but I've heard enough conversations about social networking to realise that there are people out there who see a long list of social networks to their name as nothing more than just an ego check.

People that want to be seen using the latest network, regardless of what the site or service does, are using that service for the wrong reasons. Joining networks due to popularity might be considered okay if you want to gain value from that particular network if you're a business owner or product owner and you can see a market in that network. Seeing a social network as the next big thing people will be talking about and joining it right away is not going to make you any more liked or respected. It's certainly not going to make your life anymore fulfilling.

It's sad to see people join so many different social networks just because they can. They're not a professional indicator and they're certainly not a masure of success. They're a time sink if you're not careful in managing your time on them.

I'd much rather see a carefully curated list of social networks against a person's name or profile. A list of networks that person takes part in and shares their creativity in those networks. A curated list of networks is an indicator that the person has taken the time to weed out those networks that are surplus to their needs and they've recognized the networks that benefit them.

That's the person who's site I like to read or follow. The person that would much rather focus on putting a short story together, publish some code or even show their sketchnotes for a talk they have attended. Their focus is on what they create, not putting their name on every social network they can join.

I'm four editions into my App.net newsletter and it has definitely been an eye-opener into running a regular publication. Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying the process of putting together each newsletter and finding content to include, but there is a few areas where I could improve the newsletter and the process of putting it together.

Better user recommendations

This is a new section which only appeared in the third edition. The idea is that I monitor the new accounts being created on App.net and poll for a few days before the newsletter goes out. I filter for possible spam accounts and only include accounts that have been marked as 'human'.

On the weekend before the newsletter goes out I can then analyse the most active accounts for that week and pick out some recommendations for the subscribers of the newsletter.

There's so many parts of this process that can be improved:

1. Discount feed accounts - A lot of 'human' accounts are using tools like Twitterfeed to automate posting to their account. These are not the type of accounts I want to recommend.
2. Filter for users that don't have a bio - There's not much use in recommending somebody if they don't have their bio filled in telling people about themselves.
3. Automate the user polling script - I manually kick off a couple of scripts to poll the App.net API. Ideally this should take care of itself and just run on an interval. Nothing to stop me doing that on my laptop, but I should probably schedule it to start during the day when I know my MBP won't be in hibernation.
4. Scripting the users list - I put together the list of recommended users in the format of Markdown (like the rest of the newsletter), although there shouldn't be anything to stop me grabbing my list of recommended users and exporting it as a snippet of Markdown that can be included in the newsletter.

Conversation recommendations

I'm still undecided about this one, but another idea for App.net members was a service that reads back through your timeline for a given time period and weights conversations based on the number of replies, stars and reposts it gets. On a daily basis, subscribers would then get an email showing the most active conversations over that given time period.

I want to include this in the Netterpress newsletter, but on a per user basis it makes more sense to run it as a separate service. The idea could still be used in the newsletter, but instead of reading back on a specific user's timeline, it could poll the trending conversations feed and use that to search for active conversations.

More automation

I've already talked about automation earlier, but where I also want to automate the newsletter is the finding of new content. It's a manual job right now. I have included hashtags in the first two editions of the newsletter that people can use to tag their posts if it contains news that could be included in the newsletter, but the response to this has been limited.

Going well

So far the newsletter has shown me that putting a newsletter together involves a lot of work. It has been hard work balancing this with freelance work, but with more subscribers I could start blocking off more time during the day to getting an automated news discovery and publication process put together. It's still early days for the newsletter though, and I'm only halfway through the trial run.

Must catch up with The Clone Wars series before this comes on.

These are definitely one of the best brand of lights I've used for cycling. Great to see they're getting more and more powerful but still use USB to charge them.

Must check the LBS to see if they have the Blinder Arc 1.7 in stock. It would be great for son's bike.

Being effective is a seven point plan.

Thanks NB.

Last week I hurt my back while lifting my youngest son. Five days on and the pain is still there. This latest episode of back pain and many more before it are now putting ideas in my head that it might be time for a standing desk or even a desk that can switch between standing and sitting. There's still a few obstacles though to this.

Is it really beneficial?

I know there's been a lot of talk in the developer community about the benefits of a standing desk but like many of the new ideas that come from the software community, I take each one with a pinch of salt. It's not that I think sitting all day is fine and healthy, it's not, it's just that I've just yet to see a link to the medical research done to back up this claim that standing is definitely healthier for you than sitting.

The last thing I want to do is move from a sitting desk to a standing desk and then run into even more problems with my back. As humans, we're all unique. What works for some people may not work for others. I'm quite a big guy in terms of height and weight. Would I really benefit from switching to a standing desk or would I be causing myself even more pain?

I enjoy sitting

The other problem is that I do enjoy sitting. It's not because I'm lazy or over-weight, I just enjoy sitting. Programming, writing or even sketching, I enjoy it more when I am sitting. My work space is setup to compliment my sitting position and everything around me is within easy reach. I could change all this with a standing desk, but then I would need to change a number of things like my monitor, my keyboard and mouse space, and basically everything else on my desk. This isn't just a switch from one keyboard to another, this is a big change in the way that I work.

I'm already productive

At the moment I am fairly productive through the day but that's because I get up and take frequent breaks, I eat a balanced diet through the day and of course I opt to drink water through the day rather than soda. These don't take away the back pain, but it keeps me healthy and stops my energy levels dipping in the afternoon. While I try to keep as healthy as possible, would having a standing desk really benefit me in the ways that so many other standing developers have seen?

I'm not convinced that I would switch to a permanent standing desk, but having the ability to switch between the two would be something I would be interested in. I'm still thinking on this for the moment and I don't see me making any drastic changes over the next year. Perhaps I might try standing for a couple of hours a day and work solely on my MacBook so that I don't need to move too much about on my desk.

Before I consider a standing desk seriously, there's also the issue of finding the right chair to sit in. Before all the frenzy around standing desks happened, people were quite happy to sit while working. The Herman Miller Aeron proved to be a very popular choice of chair for many developers, but I couldn't justify spending that amount of money on a chair when I first started working from home. I'm currently using a chair purchased from IKEA. It provides me with a comfortable place to sit during the day but it definitely lacks in any adjustability I need to do to change my sitting position through the day.

Maybe a better chair is all I need for the moment?

All this week I had the pleasure of taking my youngest to nursery in the morning. It's been great dropping him off and seeing his place of learning. It wasn't without incident though. On Wednesday morning my back twinged while lifting the little guy so that he could press the buzzer at the nursery door. The last two days have been very uncomfortable.

After a painful day yesterday, I had to lie down. A couple of pain killers later and I'm lying on my bed wondering what to do next. I picked up my phone and started writing. 500 words, 1000 words, 1500 words. The milestones were just flowing past. When I started feeling tired I had written 2500 words. Not a bad start to a book.

It took me to being flat on my back before I started writing, and once it started it just kept going. I've probably made dozens of spelling and grammar mistakes, but that's what the first draft is for. It's not about details, it's just about writing. Getting the idea on paper using words. I've made that first step in getting something down and I'll be continuing with it now over the weekend.

via FGGT

Social networks are a funny thing. They allow people who are shy or uncomfortable in crowds to be as vocal as they like. I often wonder though if this is less common than people might think. I assume that there are many others like me who use the internet hundreds of times a day. Announcing their arrivals at locations, updating their status on an hourly basis and posting their lives to the world as if they are the star in their own reality TV show.

I definitely don't do this.

My social networking habits have rarely changed in the last few years. I keep to myself mostly, engage with others when I want to and only contribute when I'm sure that I am correct in what I am saying. It's a reflection of who I am when I am around people. A quiet listener. I don't say much unless I'm confident in what I am going to say.

One of the problems I have is that initial reach out to someone, whether that person is physically in the room, or another avatar in the world of social networking. Reaching out online is easier, but I still hesitate a bit when I'm making that initial introduction. I always thought that when social networks started with Facebook and Twitter, I would be more engaged with people than I am at a conference or meet up. Turns out I was wrong and the reason is that if that person is in the room or on the other side of the world, I always will be hesitant in making that first introduction. It's just who I am.

And that's enough for me as an individual. I use my voice online when I have to or want to. Mostly when I want to. If I have to say something, I usually think about what I am going to say first before committing to clicking the button that publishes your inner thoughts for the world to see. In that case, most of the time I'll scrap the idea of posting what I have to say and let it slide.

Does your online personality reflect who you truly are as a person?